Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam (PACE) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam with confidence. Enhance your knowledge with a range of quizzes, multiple choice questions, and detailed explanations. Equip yourself with the skills necessary to excel in your paralegal career!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What does a hold harmless clause in a contract signify?

  1. It grants permission to use someone's property

  2. It prevents one party from being held responsible for damage caused by the other party

  3. It allows unilateral changes to contract terms

  4. It ensures both parties share responsibility for damages

The correct answer is: It prevents one party from being held responsible for damage caused by the other party

A hold harmless clause in a contract signifies that one party agrees not to hold the other party liable for certain damages or losses that may arise from the agreement. This means that if an incident occurs that results in damage or injury, the party protected by the hold harmless clause will not be held responsible for any claims, liabilities, or costs incurred by the other party as a result of those incidents. This type of clause is important in risk management and liability allocation, as it allows parties to define responsibility in advance and protect themselves from legal claims related to the actions of the other party. Often found in contracts related to construction, leases, or event management, a hold harmless clause is instrumental in providing a level of security and peace of mind for parties engaging in potentially risky activities. In contrast, the other options do not accurately depict the function of a hold harmless clause. For example, granting permission to use someone’s property does not reflect liability concerns and thus doesn’t relate to the protection intended by a hold harmless clause. Similarly, allowing unilateral changes to contract terms relates to contract flexibility rather than liability protection, and ensuring both parties share responsibility for damages contradicts the essence of a hold harmless clause, which is intended to exempt one party from such liabilities.